Previous | Next

4 more things about amazonfail

1) Amazon hasn't said a thing, WTF?

2) The controversy has been picked up by over 300 newspapers and other sources. It's easy to follow as the news spread: yahoo news or google news.

3) In the category of how (rather than why), it seems they used the subject headings in the metadata. These are library and bookstore tags created by publishers and sometimes supplemented by Amazon. More here at Dear Author.

4) There's a troll that claims he caused it for lulz -- this is in the LJ comm brutal_honesty. He's lying, do not focus on him. bryant's debunking post.

Comments

Apr. 13th, 2009 05:34 pm (UTC)
Yes, yes, the metadata! How could I have forgotten? My book got de-ranked with only one tag, "gay romance." But I forgot about the metadata, which is "gay & lesbian, literature & fiction, fiction, gay romance, gay, erotica, adult, contemporary, soldiers, special forces, military." Of course!!! *smooches you*

Whether or not there was a glitch, there is no doubt Amazon put in place a very creepy mechanism for removing books from searches by stripping sales rank. It's possible they have been doing this since the summer of 2008 if not earlier.

http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/28/amazon-hiding-sales-ranks-of-naughty-books-e-book-standards-and-drm-angles/

If metadata was the basis for de-ranking, then we can forget the theory that some outside group or individual troll was somehow flagging content to turn on the "de-rank" switch or whatever.


Apr. 14th, 2009 12:30 am (UTC)
I am so very glad to have relieved your mind. And I agree with you to an extent about the search and sales rank issues. Disclosure would be good, and fairly prominent labels, like "Safesearch". I don't want explicit porn of any kind coming up on kidlet's searches on Amazon. But I want to be able to find Delta Force smut when it's available!