Mar. 16th, 2008 at 6:52 PM
But the evidence of extensive copying and pasting of text in the published version of
My problem with this the situation is that the author accepted the praise, awards, and publication as though she deserved credit. If she'd said something about how great a writer Charlotte Brontë was, and explained that a huge part of the story was lifted from the original, that would have been appropriate attribution. Accepting those compliments was more than just a lie, and accepting the award it wronged the writers who wrote every word of their fic.
Here is the original fanfic disclaimer, which was pasted in a thread in
Disclaimer: This is a work of total fiction, using characters based on the novel Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. I don’t pretend to represent the actors in any realistic way – I’m just dressing them up and playing with them."Here is the warning from the published book, as transcribed by
(From Chapter 37 header of "A Hidden Passion" bynamarie120.)
"In retelling the story, I have tried to remain as true to the tone and language of the original novel as possible. Some sentences (the opening lines of the first and last chapters in particular) are so iconic I have left them unchanged. While there are of course alterations and additions to the original plot, I hope the work as a whole will be seen as the homage I certainly intended."That note strongly implies that -- aside from the opening lines and last chapter -- the rest of the text was in fact changed. Perhaps by "changed" she meant, "rearranged and slightly reworded". That's certainly not what I expect from an experienced fanfic writer, and wish she'd been somewhat less "true to the tone and language".
Author's Note of A Hidden Passion, by Lucia Logan, August 2007
an anon said: i was betrayed by someone i trusted. i was made to feel a fool for lavishing praise on someone who claimed someone else's work..
That makes me very sad. I don't want
What should we do next time, if we see something in a fic that's way too familiar? I don't really know, but in this case, emailing to her clearly did not work, because several people tried that. Perhaps friends in a group could approach the author and encourage her or him to come clean. And, as a final step, posting to a journal or to a community might be necessary. Because it's a moral and ethical error to plagiarize, and the faster we get it over with, the better. Anyone with other thoughts or useful experience, please tell me, I want to know!
More useful posts on this topic by caras_galadhon (the original post), slashfairy's meditation on it, telesilla's lively discussion, and jasmineskie's comment.
To end on an up note (via
Comments
Someone with "other thoughts" :)
Plagiarism is an empirical determination, it's either found or it's not. And if it is, then the author isn't in a position to do anything but pull the work and issue an apology. In the real world (for lack of a better phrase) you don't get a choice with this. Your work gets withdrawn, your award gets reneged. You're lucky if you don't get blacklisted. We shouldn't make people feel there are different rules about it in fandom. It doesn't help anybody.
I looked at the essay at Speak Its Name, as well as the excerpts comparing passages, and good heavens. It's not just that large parts of the story were not hers, apparently hardly anything was hers. Not the plotting, the characters or characterizations, not even sentences. Even commas are replicated.
It's hard to believe she could have written something like that without bells going off in her head. She had to have had the text of Jane Eyre right in front of her.
It seems maybe what she was trying to do was sort of a "remake." In that case she should have simply said so. But then that wouldn't be writing worth publishing.
< /2 cents>
Re: Someone with "other thoughts" :)
I suspect that it started as a "remake", which seems like the dullest part of fanfic, but rabid shippers like that kind of thing. And then somehow, in between that and the publication, she may have forgotten how much she didn't remake, or thought that the gay sex would be the important part to readers.
But she shoulda confessed and acknowledged the mistake, rather than hiding. Sooner said, sooner mended.
I'm struck by the contrast with mainstream published fiction. In Dan Simmonds' Lovedeath, there's a story about a poet of the First World War. Simmonds makes a body of work for that character by using work from real-life war poets like Sassoon and Owen. But he's very clear about this in the introduction, describing exactly what text has been lifted and why.
If in fandom we have a great desire to be taken seriously and for the form to be respected, then we need to honour the form by maintaining the same ethical standards that would be practised elsewhere in fiction.
It's not just a question of fandom vs. the rest of the world, it's also trusting each other. Accepting praise for something you haven't done breaks the social contract.
BTW, I love your icon!
I don't think a single case necessarily should blacklist someone, but in this case, with the extent and the refusal to own up, as well as knowingly publishing the work! Wow, I'd be hard, hard pressed to ever want to read another word by the author.
If the words are not yours, you cite where they came from. No more, no less.
She took passages lock, stock and barrel without giving credit to that actual author while taking the praise from readers for that author's words.
That's wrong, no ifs ands or butts.
And in fandom, it is definitely dishonest not to give credit. *sigh*