Previous | Next

Plagiarism in fandom

I've read a hell of a lot of LOTR RPS, and I've never seen one which used the exact words of the original, without author credit.

But the evidence of extensive copying and pasting of text in the published version of [info]namarie120's story "A Hidden Passage", about her incorporation of original text from "Jane Eyre", is compelling. I admire [info]caras_galadhon for bringing out into the open.

My problem with this the situation is that the author accepted the praise, awards, and publication as though she deserved credit. If she'd said something about how great a writer Charlotte Brontë was, and explained that a huge part of the story was lifted from the original, that would have been appropriate attribution. Accepting those compliments was more than just a lie, and accepting the award it wronged the writers who wrote every word of their fic.

Here is the original fanfic disclaimer, which was pasted in a thread in [info]telesilla's post.
Disclaimer: This is a work of total fiction, using characters based on the novel Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. I don’t pretend to represent the actors in any realistic way – I’m just dressing them up and playing with them."

(From Chapter 37 header of "A Hidden Passion" by [info]namarie120.)
Here is the warning from the published book, as transcribed by [info]rocketbalm, a friend of [info]namarie120, posted this in a thread:
"In retelling the story, I have tried to remain as true to the tone and language of the original novel as possible. Some sentences (the opening lines of the first and last chapters in particular) are so iconic I have left them unchanged. While there are of course alterations and additions to the original plot, I hope the work as a whole will be seen as the homage I certainly intended."

Author's Note of A Hidden Passion, by Lucia Logan, August 2007
That note strongly implies that -- aside from the opening lines and last chapter -- the rest of the text was in fact changed. Perhaps by "changed" she meant, "rearranged and slightly reworded". That's certainly not what I expect from an experienced fanfic writer, and wish she'd been somewhat less "true to the tone and language".

an anon said: i was betrayed by someone i trusted. i was made to feel a fool for lavishing praise on someone who claimed someone else's work..

That makes me very sad. I don't want [info]namarie120 to delete her journal and run away. What I'd like to have seen, and to see now, would be an acknowledgment that large parts of the story were not hers, an apology for misleading people, and for her to return the Slashy Oscar award so it can be given to the runner up.

What should we do next time, if we see something in a fic that's way too familiar? I don't really know, but in this case, emailing to her clearly did not work, because several people tried that. Perhaps friends in a group could approach the author and encourage her or him to come clean. And, as a final step, posting to a journal or to a community might be necessary. Because it's a moral and ethical error to plagiarize, and the faster we get it over with, the better. Anyone with other thoughts or useful experience, please tell me, I want to know!

More useful posts on this topic by caras_galadhon (the original post), slashfairy's meditation on it, telesilla's lively discussion, and jasmineskie's comment.

To end on an up note (via [info]ruuger), a fabulous pastiche with a very distinctive and un-Brontë voice: Jayne Eyre!

Comments

Mar. 17th, 2008 06:17 am (UTC)

Someone with "other thoughts" :)

You know, I have to say, I don't think it's a good idea to coddle the writer into admitting plagiarism. That gives her/him the impression that it's a matter open for discussion.

Plagiarism is an empirical determination, it's either found or it's not. And if it is, then the author isn't in a position to do anything but pull the work and issue an apology. In the real world (for lack of a better phrase) you don't get a choice with this. Your work gets withdrawn, your award gets reneged. You're lucky if you don't get blacklisted. We shouldn't make people feel there are different rules about it in fandom. It doesn't help anybody.

I looked at the essay at Speak Its Name, as well as the excerpts comparing passages, and good heavens. It's not just that large parts of the story were not hers, apparently hardly anything was hers. Not the plotting, the characters or characterizations, not even sentences. Even commas are replicated.

It's hard to believe she could have written something like that without bells going off in her head. She had to have had the text of Jane Eyre right in front of her.

It seems maybe what she was trying to do was sort of a "remake." In that case she should have simply said so. But then that wouldn't be writing worth publishing.

< /2 cents>
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:21 am (UTC)

Re: Someone with "other thoughts" :)

Every time I start disagreeing with you, you counter my objections.

I suspect that it started as a "remake", which seems like the dullest part of fanfic, but rabid shippers like that kind of thing. And then somehow, in between that and the publication, she may have forgotten how much she didn't remake, or thought that the gay sex would be the important part to readers.

But she shoulda confessed and acknowledged the mistake, rather than hiding. Sooner said, sooner mended.
Mar. 17th, 2008 06:51 pm (UTC)
Hi, I'm here via meta_roundup. :)

I'm struck by the contrast with mainstream published fiction. In Dan Simmonds' Lovedeath, there's a story about a poet of the First World War. Simmonds makes a body of work for that character by using work from real-life war poets like Sassoon and Owen. But he's very clear about this in the introduction, describing exactly what text has been lifted and why.

If in fandom we have a great desire to be taken seriously and for the form to be respected, then we need to honour the form by maintaining the same ethical standards that would be practised elsewhere in fiction.
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:27 am (UTC)
If namarie had done an introduction like that, I think it would have been a fine acknowledgment, and I would not have considered it plagiarism.

It's not just a question of fandom vs. the rest of the world, it's also trusting each other. Accepting praise for something you haven't done breaks the social contract.

BTW, I love your icon!
Mar. 18th, 2008 10:54 am (UTC)
Thanks! It's a photo from a history book that my boyfriend and I couldn't stop giggling at. It's meant to be two pilgrims "helping" each other but, well, we're twelve...
Mar. 17th, 2008 07:44 pm (UTC)
Plagiarism is such a tough thing to deal with, particularly in the fan-world since it's a betrayal of trust and the coin of the realm is feedback.

I don't think a single case necessarily should blacklist someone, but in this case, with the extent and the refusal to own up, as well as knowingly publishing the work! Wow, I'd be hard, hard pressed to ever want to read another word by the author.
Mar. 17th, 2008 07:46 pm (UTC)
Err, I should say though, that while technically she didn't do anything wrong given how the original work is in the public domain, it doesn't make it feel any less sleazy or dishonest.
Mar. 17th, 2008 11:55 pm (UTC)
Matters not if the original work is in the public domain. That just means she can't be got at for copyright violation. She is still builty of plagiarism.

If the words are not yours, you cite where they came from. No more, no less.
She took passages lock, stock and barrel without giving credit to that actual author while taking the praise from readers for that author's words.

That's wrong, no ifs ands or butts.
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:35 am (UTC)
sorry I should have clarified, I did mean wrong in the legal sense versus the ethical.
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:58 am (UTC)
I read it that way, not to worry.
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:39 am (UTC)
I totally agree with you. Just because it's not a copyright infringement doesn't mean it's right. But notice the publisher pulled the books -- the lack of credit made them iffy, bordering on fraudulent.

And in fandom, it is definitely dishonest not to give credit. *sigh*
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:40 am (UTC)
I'm not quite blacklisting her from the LJ lotrips listing, but I am going to post something there with links, so people who read that comm can tell what's going on.
Mar. 18th, 2008 12:43 am (UTC)
I think that's a good way to handle it. Just from what I've read this seems like a fairly extreme case and not in her favour at all, but I suppose I'm an optimist in terms of people learning from their mistakes.